Re: Error with For Loop Return Value
Firstly never apologise for asking questions. Have a look if the attached helps. You use text subscript instead of a vector subscript (keystroke [ ) operator.
View ArticleRe: How can I tell symbolic expression solver to output the result as a...
Try the attached. Not sure if the apparent improvement is real or not! Alan
View ArticleRe: Exclusion of a component
Isolate for Exclusion is a mesh control used for convergence. Specifically, it tells the software to exclude the selected from consideration in the convergence study. The only way this could help you...
View ArticleRe: Attempt to launch MKS Integrity client Timed out.
Like suggested in error message, I've added Integrity Client Install directory to path and now I get the following error. si: MKS Integrity Client returned Bad HTTP Status. I do not know what this...
View ArticleRe: Exclusion of a component
I played around with his model; looks like it was an issue with the fastener "M8_2"; the model meshed after re-defining it.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Error with For Loop Return Value
Firstly never apologise for asking questions. Never? Even if, for example, you asked your wife why it was such a big deal that you forgot your 10th wedding anniversary?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Error with For Loop Return Value
Brilliant. I think would have to come under the 'rhetorical question' category though.
View ArticleRe: regarding rate model
See if the attached helps. Note, some of my modifications near the end of the worksheet are definitely wrong! They are there to give guidance on not mixing up terms with different units. Alan
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Fasteners on symmetry plane
I believe you said in your other thread that you're using WF5 (I'm not too sure if this feature was added in), but there is a pre-load for solid elements. If this feature isn't in WF5, then you could...
View ArticleRe: Mathcad provides incorrect solution
Wonderful! Thanks so much. I often wondered if there was an option that I could change to fix this. I don't know if this will negatively affect me anywhere else, but it fixes this problem. To be...
View ArticleRe: Mathcad provides incorrect solution
I don't know if this will negatively affect me anywhere else, but it fixes this problem.I doubt it. The option is there because sometimes an exact comparison is needed, but that's not ever likely to be...
View ArticleRe: Mathcad provides incorrect solution
I guess it was said before, but all I see is the effect of rounding and conversion as is to expect when dealing with computer floating point arithmetic. There is no simple way to avoid it and assuming...
View ArticleModel with simple frustrum - volume calculation wrong
I make a lot of models that involve pyramidal frustrums (transition of a rectangular section to another rectangular section, linearly). Rather than use the measured value calculated by Creo, I thought...
View ArticleCreo equivalent of SolidWorks configurations in parts?
Hi there, I've been with a new company using Creo 2.0 for the last three months and we would really benefit from being able to create parts with what I know as "configurations": I'm not sure what the...
View ArticleRe: Windchill 10.1 WGM Creo 2 compare status
Carl, we added the additonal status columns to our default workspace view and create some new table views without the status icons. By default I understand they are not displayed because it results...
View ArticleRe: Creo equivalent of SolidWorks configurations in parts?
Hi Andy, Family table in Creo Parametric is as Configuration in Solidworks and to use that functionality: 1. Create the part as sketch you attached.2. Select Tools > Family Table3....
View ArticleRe: Model with simple frustrum - volume calculation wrong
I think Creo is right. I'm not sure where the formula came from but ... L = l_base - ((l_base-l_top)/delta_z) * Z W = w_base - ((w_base-w_top)/delta_z) * Z A = L * W = l_base*w_base-...
View ArticleRe: Exclusion of a component
Are you looking for displacement in the Y direction for the entire assembly?
View ArticleRe: Model with simple frustrum - volume calculation wrong
I should be able to simplify the integral to be the same as the original formula, but so far no luck. I looked at the Wikipedia page that showed the derivation of the original formula, but it doesn't...
View Article